World Public Opinion has released a study looking at the knowledge of Americans on several issues. These are rarely flattering for the country, and this study is no different.
What is of note is that Fox News viewers were much more likely to be misinformed. From alternet.org:
* 91 percent believe the stimulus legislation lost jobs
* 72 percent believe the health reform law will increase the deficit
* 72 percent believe the economy is getting worse
* 60 percent believe climate change is not occurring
* 49 percent believe income taxes have gone up
* 63 percent believe the stimulus legislation did not include any tax cuts
* 56 percent believe Obama initiated the GM/Chrysler bailout
* 38 percent believe that most Republicans opposed TARP
* 63 percent believe Obama was not born in the U.S. (or that it is unclear)
These percentages are significantly higher than non-Fox viewers.
It isn’t the first study to find that Fox News viewers are misinformed, and it likely won’t be the last. When you push an agenda and ignore facts, this is bound to happen.
Enjoy knowing they have the most viewers. See comments for correct information.
Adam Feser
27 Comments
login
Polls
Recent Comments
- internal hemorrhoids treatments on Egypt Reactions
- like this on John Thune and Sotomayor
- jquery mobile tutorial on College Football/Nebraska-KSU Challenge
- discount learn css3 pdf on Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now aka ACORN
- site link on Rep. Weiner on Justice Thomas and the Appearance of Bias
- rate us online on House Officially Disapproves of Wilson’s Outburst
- rate us on Will Rogers Said It Best
- t1 circuit info on Good God Glenn
- reality show casting on Teacher takes Student the wood shed…
- insurnace companies on Vermont Legalizes Gay Marriage
Most Commented Posts
- Miss me yet (130)
- Arizona's Racist Law (119)
- Confessions of a Tea Party Casualty (83)
- Smoking Ban Thoughts and Poll (80)
- Tom Tancredo Wants Literacy Tests (76)
- The Apparent Trap/Hawaiian Health Care (62)
- Sarah Palin: Persecuted Jew? (57)
- Healthcare (53)
- Cash for Clunkers: What a joke! (50)
- Tom Coburn Has Pelosi's Back and a Point (49)
Blogroll
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
I’d love to run that same poll on readers of the South Dakota blogosphere!
Actually Fox doesn’t have the most viewers — and this is one of the most often quoted pieces of Fox misinformation. Fox calls itself “America’s most watched cable news network,” based on a Nielson rating that checks which channel a TV is tuned to at any moment. An individual TV can be counted many times on the same day. There is another Nielson metric called the “cume” that records whether or not a TV was tuned to a channel for at least 6 minutes straight on a given day, and only count each TV once. The cume says that on any given day about 20% more TVs get tuned to CNN than to Fox. Together these two measurements indicate that CNN has more individual viewers and that Fox viewers stay tuned to Fox for longer periods of time. Or putting it a different way, more people get information from CNN, but people who get information from Fox tend to get it drilled into them over and over.
Thanks, Doug, for some very interesting material. I’ve often wondered just how reliable Nielson is (mostly whenever one of my favorite shows gets canceled), and it’s good to know they have different means of measuring viewers, even if they aren’t reported as frequently. I’ll be sure and remember this.
Prior to the Challenger shuttle explosion, it had been planned to send a journalist into space,much like the teahcer Christa McAuliffe(sp). The plan was to send Geraldo Rivera to study the effect of weightlessness on weightlessness. Its nice to see that you have picked up the ball and completed the mission.
Perhaps you can see what the audiences of MSNBC, CNN, Face the Nation and whatever the three people that watch ABC said to the same questions. I’ll wait for your report.
You could just go ahead and read it. Here is the full report: http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/dec10/Misinformation_Dec10_rpt.pdf. But if you’re looking for the difference in false responses, this paragraph gets at the crux of it:
Those who watched Fox News almost daily were significantly more likely than those who never watched it to believe that most economists estimate the stimulus caused job losses (12 points more likely), most economists have estimated the health care law will worsen the deficit (31 points), the economy is getting worse (26 points), most scientists do not agree that climate change is occurring (30 points), the stimulus legislation did not include any tax cuts (14 points), their own income taxes have gone up (14 points), the auto bailout only occurred under Obama (13 points), when TARP came up for a vote most Republicans opposed it (12 points) and that it is not clear that Obama was born in the United States (31 points). The effect was also not simply a function of partisan bias, as people who voted Democratic and watched Fox News were also more likely to have such misinformation than those who did not watch it–though by a lesser margin than those who voted Republican.
Ignorant speculation and wishing beaten again by facts. Well done, Adam!
Republicans can’t handle the truth. The ignorant speculation seems to be working for them.
Can you honestly say the stimulus created enough jobs to generate enough income tax revenue to justify the money spent? Sure it created jobs, but was the money spent the best way it could have been? And how many jobs were lost in the same period of time?
The health care law will push prices up causing more people to apply for medicaid. The states can’t afford that, so the federal government may pick up some of the bill, and since there is no money in Washington, it could very well add to the debt.
The economy is getting worse. The dollar is dropping, gas is rising, home prices are dropping, unemployment remains high. Open your eyes.
Taxes in general have gone up. Maybe not income taxes, but we are taxed over and over again, it’s sick.
The stimulus contained mainly temporary tax cuts.
Obama may not have initiated the auto bailouts, but he sure jumped on board and took credit for them.
Most Republicans supported TARP, but opposed the way it was used.
Climate change…come on, the climate changes every day! Why are liberals so obsessed with controlling it? Why should I trust a bunch of guys who don’t know that their checking account is $14,000,000,000,000 overdrawn to be able to control the climate? They can’t do simple math!
As far as Obama being born in the US, it just doesn’t matter. We’re two years into his term, hopefully he’ll be gone in another two. Time to focus on what can be changed rather than worrying about the past of a man who is dragging our nation through the mud when judges will not even hear arguments about his citizenship.
There are some opinions from a registered Republican.
This seems pretty good to me: http://theamericannews.net/election/?p=1654
..
The healthcare plan will reduce the deficit. Here’s how: http://www.newsweek.com/2010/03/20/how-health-care-reform-reduces-the-deficit-in-5-not-so-easy-steps.html. The CBO has estimated repealing reform would increase the deficit by $230 billion.
..
The dollar actually got stronger recently. Unemployment dropped a bit in December and the private sector added a lot of jobs. And I’m not sure that gas prices are a good way to gauge the economy. But it’d definitely gotten better.
..
The problem isn’t that the climate changes, it’s that man-made climate change is happening at a fast rate. It’s actually quite the opposite of controlling it. Those damned liberals are concerned that we are controlling it, and they would like to see that stop.
..
And the fact that so many still think he wasn’t born in the US is just evidence of how poorly informed they are.
..
It’s been awhile, Ray. Good to see a couple comments.
Forgot to mention that clearly the tax cuts in the stimulus would be temporary, but the fact remains that he cut taxes. I’m not sure what taxes you’re referring to (cigarettes?). But people refuse to believe that a dirty liberal cut all their taxes. He even caved and continued the Bush tax cut for millionaires that was supposed to be temporary. If people can’t just admit that he’s cut taxes, they’re being willfully ignorant.
I don’t know, I enjoyed the comments on the link for your stimulus entry. I question the wisdom in adding to the debt to “create” jobs. The government can pump money into the economy and some jobs will come of it, but when the stimulus money runs out, how long-term will the jobs be? My employer hired temporary workers and were able to take stimulus benefits for it (I believe it was in the form of tax credits). So if the government borrows money to create temp jobs, what progress did we make? You don’t have long-term taxes being paid in from those “created” jobs.
The CBO is assuming that things will work the way Obama promises. The fact is that premiums will go up, companies will drop coverage, and more will go to Medicaid. The states can’t afford it and the government is creating the additional applications, so our wonderful and caring federal government will write checks for money they don’t have to support the need. Then they’ll talk about how the reform bill didn’t do enough since health care is still adding to the debt, so the government had better either run the show, or add more crippling regulations to the industry. It’s a vicious cycle.
The dollar is questionable since we keep printing it in large quantities. China and Russia don’t really care to deal with it like they used to. The Arab states are creating their own currency to deal with oil so the dollar won’t be needed there. The value of the dollar will drop as world’s demand for it drops.
Will you be posting on South Dakota’s new governor Adam? Wondering what you think of his ideas on budget cuts. I appreciate his approaches and what he said about the importance of helping a person when they’re down, but not supporting those who lie down. I like the idea of a conservative governor who actually wants a balanced budget and sounds willing to make the tough choices to get there.
I think it’s hard to determine which are permanent at this point, but we’ll know in the future. But either way jobs were created for people that badly needed them. And the work they did often had lasting results.
..
So what you say is more likely to happen than what the CBO says? Why am I to believe that?
..
I should probably write something up about him. Thanks for the thought. I’ll try and find time to do that soon.
The ones at my company were temporary and ended when the stimulus dollars did.
You’re right, the CBO, responsible for the $14 trillion debt should always be trusted.
How are they to blame? Are you seriously not going to look at cutting taxes for the top tier while conducting two wars as a large portion of that? Or did the CBO make those decisions?
The CBO is to blame when they continue to justify Congressional spending while the debt continues to rise.
What do you base that statement on? And I’ll take that as a tacit admission that they’re not responsible for the $14 trillion debt.
They are responsible. They aren’t responsible for all of it, but they are responsible for the fact that the number continues to climb. With a debt at $14 trillion, they should not be approving or encouraging any bill that will add to the debt. No new spending, period.
They simply judge the effect legislation will have. I’m not sure how that puts blame at their feet. And I still don’t get why I should take your word over theirs.
One of the problems is that one of the ways the health bill claims to save money is by cutting Medicare payments to doctors. I highly doubt that Congress will actually follow through with that. If they don’t follow through with it, then do we still save the money?
If I’m not mistaken, the IMAC will be able to enact reform regardless of Congress, unless Congress has an alternative way to save the same amount of money.
I’ve recently started a blog, and the information you provide on this web site has helped me a lot. Thanks for all of your time & work.
Breaking news 10:00 p.m. Sunday May 1, 2011. Osama Bin Laden dead, killed by U.S. Forces in Pakistan. President to speak shortly on NBC tv.
Hello There. I discovered your blog the usage of msn. This is an extremely neatly written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to learn extra of your useful information. Thank you for the post. I will definitely return.
Great site here. So many websites like this cover subjects that can’t be found in print. I don’t know how we got on 12 years ago with just print media.
I figured out that the more I read, the smarter I get. You might wish to add it to your post
Great Post: I just wrote a similar article: http://orionsblackhole.blogspot.com/
Question. How exactly is Hugo Chavez a threat?