Main image
12th April
2011
written by adamfeser

Haha. Trump tied for GOP primary lead. If this is a sign of what the Republican primary is going to be like, count me in.

Throwing a sideshow like this into the mix can only make things more entertaining while simultaneously making the GOP less credible. I know he does this often (and with different parties, depending on the climate), but he’s really getting after it. This poll shows just what the effect has been, and I love it.

I guess I should note that it is also horrifying that he placed this high, but let’s just enjoy the insanity for what it is.

Enjoy America’s pastime.

Adam Feser

Tags: ,

14 Comments

  1. 12/04/2011

    This poll is wonderful news for Dems. When a loudmouth businessman can blow smoke for a couple weeks, tie Huckabee, and outplace every other major GOP name in the running, that shows no one in the GOP field who will actually be running has any following strong enough to make Obama afraid in 2012. Bring on the circus, Donald!

    For more good news for Dems, see this poll: http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2011/04/bad-news-for-congressional-republicans.html

    If we push hard next year, the 2012 election will look much more like 1984 than 1980.

  2. adamfeser
    15/04/2011

    I think it should be ours, especially based on what they’re sending up as competition.

  3. Ray
    20/06/2011

    There sure hasn’t been much going on here for a few months. Perhaps you need some material Adam. I’ll help you out by voicing my support for Ron Paul in 2012. I’d also absolutely love to hear your thoughts on Lybia. Let’s face it, Bush was wrong on Iraq, but he had Congressional approval, so he wasn’t the only wrong one. Obama has no approval, has had judges tell him to get approval and refuses. If Bush had gone to Iraq or anyplace else without approval you’d be calling for him to be impeached. Will you defend Obama on this? He’s acting like a king, not a president!

  4. angie
    22/06/2011

    Ray: I’ll help you out by responding. I’m not Adam, but since you seem to want or need someone to talk to:

    Ron Paul is an interesting character, but he isn’t even running, is he? Like Palin, making some noise, but is that it?

    Secondly, Libya is a NATO operation, not entirely U.S.A.

    Third, sounds like Obama is thinking more along the lines of pulling out of the Libya (that’s actually the way it’s spelled) air strikes than getting in deeper. So why would he go for approval at this point?

    My gut feeling: Get rid of Ghaddafi like we got rid of bin Laden now that we’re in there. Don’t start or take on something and then back out. You have no idea how difficult it is for me to say that because I’m usually a dove.

    I feel much the same about Afghanistan. I’m torn. What happens to that region if we pull out. What happens if we stay in it to win it?

    Iraq was a Bush lie.

  5. angie
    22/06/2011

    And Bush only had approval because of the lies he and his henchmen told Congress and the rest of America about why we needed to go to Iraq.

  6. Ray
    23/06/2011

    Ron Paul was one of the first Republicans to actually enter the race, so there’s that. We need a guy like him who will work to actually cut spending, unlike the last several presidents. Seeing him take on the Federal Reserve would be fun too. It would also be nice to see our troops come home and secure our own borders.

    Libya is a conflict that has nothing to do with us. We were told it would be days, not weeks, now it’s months. The president is outside of his authority and needs to seek congressional approval (which he likely won’t get).

    Tired of the blame Bush attitude on Iraq, he was wrong, but so was Congress. Blame every one of them who had access to the intel and supported the war. Ghaddafi poses no threat to us, neither did Hussein, but at least the intel (faulty or not) supported the “threat”. There is no intel to even suggest that Ghaddafi is a threat, in fact there is intel showing that the rebels in Lybia are in fact al qaeda members. Go Washington! Fight them in Iraq and Afghanistan, join up with them in Libya. Good plan!

    As far as wanting or needing someone to talk to, I just realized that I haven’t visited this blog in quite a while and wanted to see what’s going on. Apparently not much at all.

  7. angie
    26/06/2011

    OK, so Ron Paul has actually declared? Thanks for the info, I wasn’t sure. I guess that’s maybe because it doesn’t matter a lot to me if he does or if he doesn’t. Or who does or doesn’t at this point. I’m thinking he’ll pull out somewhere along the way when he realizes he’s perhaps just in the way and sees the money going into a deep, bottomless pit. By now Bachmann has declared too, and Romney and Huntsman. Anyone else?
    And by now, the president is saying we are pulling out of Afghanistan. Still don’t know where that’s going to leave us. But if he’s pulling out of Afghanistan, he’s perhaps not too keen on Libya either, but I think we have the advantage in an air war as we don’t on the ground.
    Libya is still a NATO operation but how is it so different from Afghanistan or any of the others in terms of if we don’t help them get Ghadaffi out like we got Saddam and bin Laden, where does that leave the western world and democracy in the Middle East? I know we can’t do it all, but do we just throw up our hands and cut out?
    I repeat, don’t blame Iraq on Congress, they only approved Bush because of the lies told to get us into Iraq.
    yeah, I don’t get here often either, but saw your post. Didn’t want you to be lonely.

  8. Ray
    26/06/2011

    It bothers me that people are willing to excuse Congress on Iraq. If so many feel like our elected Congressional Reps are too stupid to think on their own and can only do what the President tells them to do, then why bother with them? Let’s give the President full control. The very idea that so many officials in Washington are too stupid to think on their own is alarming.

    Ron Paul, Huntsman, Bachmann, Romney, Herman Cain, Pawlenty, Santorum, Gary Johnson, and Newt Gingrich are all in. Rumors are that Palin and Perry will jump in, I personally hope not. Rick Perry is scary and he’s selling out our country. I like Palin, just not for president.

    Let’s not forget that Obama jumped into Libya, he can’t even blame Bush for this one. Yeah, it’s NATO, but Obama still needs to seek Congressional approval. NATO approval does not trump Congressional approval no matter what our world government minded President wants to think.

    Your question says it all, “where does that leave the western world and democracy in the Middle East?”. The western world is not in the Middle East, it’s in the West. Democracy cannot be imposed. Unless our national security is actually threatened, we have no business over there. When real threats exist we should eliminate them, not spend years and billions of dollars building towns and schools and roads while ours fall apart and our debt piles up. Bring the troops home, cut the spending, secure our borders, drill our own oil, get back to the Constitution, and mind our own business and we’ll be better off!

  9. “At tonight’s Republican debate, former Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain was given the center seat. You can tell Cain was in the center because he was wearing one of those little plastic tables that protects the cheese.” –Jimmy Fallon

  10. Gin, Actually, after thinking about it, I should admit that it is possible that the ?á meaning carrying over from other Chinese words is all in my head. The narrower Chinese focus could also easily come from a more literal interpretation of the word “cool” that the current American usage. The oÚ?Í example is a good one. (I’ve also heard o¦?Í.) It’s impossible to prove conclusively one way or the other, though. You can’t ask people what’s going on in the subconscious when they use a word. And a non-native speaker’s opinion can never be the voice of authority on issues of “feeling” regarding a Chinese character. At the risk of overkill, I just wanted to add that I asked my Chinese co-workers to tell me what ?á meant to them, in Chinese. The first thing they said was “¸úÓcÓiO»Nu.” I insisted that they explain, though, and the essence of their definition was Aä. They said you could not describe a Nô1âÄ?oc as ?á. That differs a lot from English, because in English someone’s perceived “coolness” is based on the speaker’s own standards of what is cool, and not at all on society’s standards (although admittedly, the two influece each other in both cases).

  11. 04/12/2011

    SWEET You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post at Red, Blue & Purple » Blog Archive » The GOP Primary Gets Crazier , I’ll try to get the hang of it! Thanks, I’ve gone ahead and bookmarked http://theamericannews.net/election/?p=2495 at facebook.com so my friends can see it too

  12. Great website… Cool post, I really enjoyed reading it. I will check out your site for some more content on this subject….

  13. 19/12/2011

    … You must have a lot of spare time buddy… Sheesh… Yellowstone… Lord Above…

  14. I love that blog site layout . How did you make it? Its rather sweet.

  • login

  • Polls

    Should the Bush tax cuts end for those that make $1,000,000 per year and up?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Recent Comments

  • Most Commented Posts

  •  

    June 2013
    S M T W T F S
    « Aug    
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30