Panama’s Story of Convergence
By Paola Aliperti, Julian Chow, Marina Rousset and Alejandro Santos IMF Western Hemisphere Department
November 18, 2021
Amid a global pandemic, there’s been a lot of talk about divergence.
Advanced economies are recovering faster than many developing countries.
But what about the trend we all want to see—convergence?
Convergence
happens when the difference in incomes between richer and poorer economies
narrows. We take a look at the experience of Latin America and in
particular at Panama of such convergence.
The color spectrum map
To measure convergence, we use the ratio of the per capita GDP of Latin
American countries to that of the
United States (US). The average convergence ratio for Latin America in 2019 (before the
pandemic) was around 25 percent (of per capita GDP in the US), similar to
that of
Brazil or
Colombia. Panama’s convergence ratio was the highest in Latin America at twice the
regional average.
We plot these ratios in 2019 against how much they have changed over time
(‘convergence velocity’). We used the light spectrum to illustrate how
closely the countries were moving towards convergence (a blueshift) or
further away (a redshift). In other words, Latin American countries moving
closer towards US living standards are undergoing a blueshift. Those moving
away are redshifting.
Does this mean that Latin America is moving in the right direction? As the
figure below suggests, some countries are, but the majority are not.
Most Latin American countries are near the green area (around the y-axis),
which implies limited or no improvement when it comes to convergence. In
fact, the average convergence velocity for Latin America is a meager 0.5
percentage points per decade, similar to that of El Salvador. At that
speed, it will take centuries for Latin American countries to reach US
living standards.
Furthermore, about half the countries in Latin America had a negative
convergence velocity, with Venezuela showing the strongest redshift.
On the other side of the spectrum, Panama, Chile, the
Dominican Republic, and to a lesser extent, Uruguay,
Costa Rica, and Peru have had a blueshift. Panama displayed the highest convergence
velocity at about 8½ percentage points per decade over the last quarter of
a century—a whopping 17 times faster than the regional average. So, why is
Panama so different?
Moving fast—a closer look at Panama
Panama
owes its impressive growth performance over the past three decades to
increased investment that led to rapid capital accumulation. The prolonged
investment boom has been underpinned by Panama’s geographic location, trade
openness (Panama’s Colón Free Zone is the second largest in the world after
Hong Kong SAR), world-class ports and airport, logistics operations, and
financial system depth – all of which have benefited from globalization.
Panama has expanded and diversified its productive capacity by constructing
one of the world’s largest copper mines and doubling the Panama Canal’s
capacity to accommodate the much wider Neopanamax container ships. Panama’s
strong macroeconomic policies and performance were supported actively by
the IMF for a decade through uninterrupted
financial arrangements.
Can this trend continue? All indications are that the convergence will
continue in Panama. IMF staff project a 5 percent yearly growth rate once
the pandemic recedes—more than three times the US growth rate. At this
pace, Panama could catch up with the US by 2056.
The potential growth of 5 percent comes from a standard exercise of growth
accounting, which reveals that the share of physical capital will continue
to be the main driver of growth, although its contribution is likely to
decline (see table below). The contributions of other factors like labor
and human capital (specialized labor) are likely to remain unchanged in the
future, while the contribution of technological innovation (usually
referred as total factor productivity – TFP) is expected to become less
negative. The negative contribution of TFP growth during 2010-19 was due to
the long gestation of projects like the Panama Canal expansion and the
copper mine, which required high levels of investment (each project cost
about 10 percent of GDP), but did not generate output while the
construction was ongoing.
In fact, growth could be even higher than the 5 percent projected if
structural measures to enhance productivity lead to a positive contribution
of TFP growth (as was experienced in the past).
Among the structural policies that Panama could take to boost productivity
and ensure a healthy convergence are: (i) advancing the quality of
education to improve the effectiveness of the labor force; (ii) improving
the business environment to continue attracting high levels of investment;
(iii) facilitating the absorption of foreign talent to increase human
capital; (iv) fostering innovation to adopt better technologies; and (v)
reducing institutional vulnerabilities to enhance the overall functioning
of the economy.
The road ahead
Convergence is not guaranteed and the road ahead for Panama and the rest of
Latin America remains long. To see more ‘blueshifting’ it is imperative
that Panama and its regional peers increase productivity and diversify the
economy in the long run while mitigating the effects of the pandemic in the
near term. This can be achieved through policies that foster innovation
together with support for higher spending on education, health, and
infrastructure.
Paola Aliperti is a Research Assistant in the IMF Western Hemisphere Department.
Julian Chow is a Senior Economist in the IMF Western Hemisphere Department.
Marina Rousset is an Economist in the IMF Western Hemisphere Department.
Alejandro Santos is a Division Chief in the IMF Western Hemisphere Department.
This article first appeared on Diálogo a fondo, the IMF’s Spanish-language blog.
Source link : https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2021/11/17/na111821-panamas-story-of-convergence
Author :
Publish date : 2021-11-18 03:00:00
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.