As Arkansas prepares for the November elections, the debate over medical marijuana continues to be a flashpoint. A conservative nonprofit in Little Rock is rallying opposition to a proposed measure that would reform the state’s medical marijuana program, with claims that it could attract undocumented immigrants and turn Arkansas into a “drug use destination.”
The Family Council Action Committee, known for its conservative advocacy, announced a statewide tour ahead of the elections to encourage voters to reject the Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment of 2024.
Conservative Concerns: Immigration And Industry Monopolies
According to Marijuana Moment, during a press conference, Jerry Cox, the group’s executive director, warned that the proposed changes could have unintended consequences. “Imagine illegal immigrants being able to come here and get a free marijuana card,” Cox said. “What does that do to our state and what kind of message does that send to the rest of the country where Arkansas becomes this marijuana drug use destination?”
The amendment aims to improve access to medical cannabis, especially for rural and low-income residents, by eliminating application fees and allowing telemedicine for patient assessments. Proponents argue that this will make the program more accessible to people who need it most, especially in areas where healthcare is less accessible.
However, Cox dismissed these arguments, claiming access is not an issue. “Over 100,000 people have medical marijuana cards in Arkansas right now. Access is not a problem,” he said. He also raised concerns about monopolistic practices within the industry, potential harm to children due to fewer advertising restrictions, and fears that non-Arkansans, including undocumented immigrants, might take advantage of the system.
Supporters Push Back Against Fearmongering
Arkansans for Patient Access, the group behind the amendment, criticized the Family Council Action Committee’s claims as baseless fearmongering. Committee member Bill Paschall emphasized that to obtain a medical marijuana card, patients must provide valid state identification and be certified by an Arkansas healthcare provider. “There is no tie,” Paschall said, referring to the immigration debate. “The Family Council’s claim is nothing but a scare tactic.”
Paschall pointed out that 24 other states permit recreational marijuana use and have less stringent access requirements. “It is silly to think Arkansas will become a destination for marijuana use,” he added.
Despite the ongoing legal battles surrounding the measure’s qualification for the ballot, the Arkansas Supreme Court has yet to rule on its certification. The uncertainty adds another layer of tension as early voting begins, leaving many unsure whether their votes on the amendment will even count.
Legal And Legislative Complications
The proposed amendment has faced other legal hurdles. After initially approving nearly 77,000 signatures for the ballot, Arkansas Secretary of State John Thurston invalidated additional signatures due to a paperwork technicality. Arkansans for Patient Access challenged this decision, arguing that the disqualification was unjust. The state’s Supreme Court has since ordered Thurston to continue counting signatures, but the outcome remains undecided as two justices have recused themselves from the case, and replacements are still pending a ruling.
The Family Council’s campaign tour is set to visit 25 cities across Arkansas, with volunteers in all 75 counties distributing literature primarily in churches. Meanwhile, advertisements against the measure have also been funded, targeting local streaming platforms like Spotify.
Cover image made with AI
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Source link : http://www.bing.com/news/apiclick.aspx?ref=FexRss&aid=&tid=6716a28befaf4ce4a143eb18ceae0bd6&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.benzinga.com%2Fmarkets%2Fcannabis%2F24%2F10%2F41433713%2Farkansas-medical-marijuana-amendment-sparks-heated-immigration-debate&c=13877735267781886078&mkt=en-us
Author :
Publish date : 2024-10-21 05:10:00
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.